<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Google Books Settlement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyberlawcases.com/2009/08/31/the-google-books-settlement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyberlawcases.com/2009/08/31/the-google-books-settlement/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 19:50:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawcases.com/2009/08/31/the-google-books-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawcases.com/?p=184#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Those are fair points, but it&#039;s also worth pointing out that there is a distinction between the Google Book Project and the Google Book Settlement. If the Settlement is not approved, that doesn&#039;t necessarily mean the Project will be scuttled. But it does mean that the benefits of the Settlement will be unavailable, at least until the lawsuit is resolved or a new Settlement is put forth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are fair points, but it&#8217;s also worth pointing out that there is a distinction between the Google Book Project and the Google Book Settlement. If the Settlement is not approved, that doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean the Project will be scuttled. But it does mean that the benefits of the Settlement will be unavailable, at least until the lawsuit is resolved or a new Settlement is put forth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BobbyG</title>
		<link>http://cyberlawcases.com/2009/08/31/the-google-books-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>BobbyG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyberlawcases.com/?p=184#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I tend to support the settlement, and I hope that it&#039;s approved.  

While the objections of the authors and publishers are unsurprising, I&#039;m a little dismayed at the strength of the push back from the academic community, i.e., concerns about &quot;privatization&quot; of information and locking books behind proprietary walls.  I feel like these concerns are a bit overblown, and I hope that well meaning people don&#039;t scuttle this important project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to support the settlement, and I hope that it&#8217;s approved.  </p>
<p>While the objections of the authors and publishers are unsurprising, I&#8217;m a little dismayed at the strength of the push back from the academic community, i.e., concerns about &#8220;privatization&#8221; of information and locking books behind proprietary walls.  I feel like these concerns are a bit overblown, and I hope that well meaning people don&#8217;t scuttle this important project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

